Laura Bain - Teacher 2.0
Connect with me!
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Projects
    • TSAC STEAM Project 2017/18
    • Digital Technologies Resources 2016
    • Research in Schools 2016
    • LNCA 2015
    • Self Improving Schools
    • 21st Century Classrooms Project 2013
  • Contact

NAPLAN Online 2018: Observations from the Frontline

13/6/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
The National Assessment Program for Literacy and Numeracy, more often referred to as NAPLAN, has been under increasing scrutiny since announcing the decision to move online.  When compounded by differing opinions in the media, concerns from parents and criticism from wider educational communities, there was plenty of pressure to ensure things went as smoothly as possible this year. 

From the perspective of one of the first schools  in Queensland to participate in NAPLAN testing online, it went really well. In this post, I asked staff and students to offer some reflections in relation to their experiences with the online test and make considerations for the future of digital testing.

Why Test Online?

Among the benefits of online NAPLAN tests, ACARA (Australia's Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority), highlighted more precise results and a faster turn-around of information. The online platform also allows the introduction of reactive "tailored testing", which makes student questions easier or harder as they progress through the test. Teaching and Learning Coordinator, Kate Frewin, explains how this could be beneficial in saying:
The biggest advantage for us is the tailored testing which will show us what our students can do, not what they can’t. We look forward to analysing the improved data that NAPLAN Online will bring.
The video above explains Tailored Testing in greater detail.
A common concern about online testing was that students would get a little trigger happy and just click through questions without really thinking about them. This would especially be the case if the questions became too difficult. ACARA argued that the ability to tailor test questions as the students progressed would result in greater and prolonged engagement. Year 5 teacher, Megan Ellis, stated that this was an initial concern for her but went on to say that it was something they explicitly discussed with the students before the test. In her feedback, Megan reported positively in relation to student engagement:
The majority of the students actually said they enjoyed it. The tests were definitely more visually stimulating than previous years. 
This was also mirrored in feedback from Year 7 teachers:
The students appeared to be on task and there was little required interaction with them once they got started.

Technical Readiness and Requirements

The success of conducting NAPLAN online greatly relies on having the technology and infrastructure to support it. This was something we worked very hard to have ready. The college invested in significant upgrades to WiFi capability across the campus to ensure a strong and stable connection for a large number of simultaneous users. Come test day, we encountered no connectivity issues whatsoever. The platform loaded quickly and was responsive between student and teacher devices. 
From an ICT Manager’s perspective, and as it is with most things, adequate strategic planning, preparation and testing is required to ensure a smooth run. The main things to consider are internet connectivity (LAN or wireless), devices (BYOD vs school-owned), venue (shared hall or classrooms).
- Emmanuel Edem, IT Manager

Despite an existing BYOD program from Year 3 upwards, the college selected to administer the test from school-owned and managed devices. This was to ensure a consistent and quality experience for the students. College owned devices were Microsoft Surfaces, which are a 2 in 1 device, incorporating a touch screen, a well-sized detachable keyboard and active stylus. These features were considered important for our students to have access to for NAPLAN online. We allowed students to bring a USB mouse if they wished, but found that very few did as the students were already comfortable working on touch screen devices. ACARA recommends student familiarity with the device of administration for the test. Our current BYOD program requires students to have a touch screen Windows device. Part of the decision extend our 1:1 BYOD program down to Year 3 was to allow our students to become familiar and feel comfortable with the technology. During delivery of the test, I was very pleased to see the children interacting with the touch screen, pinching to zoom in as required and making use of built in tools. Exposure to other online platforms in the classroom appears to have equipped students with general transferrable understanding of common interface elements. 
It was pretty easy to do the test (on the computer). I knew how to go forward and back. It wasn't hard to figure out how it worked.
​- Year 5 Student

Staff and Student Readiness

Picture
There was a certain amount of stress among classroom teachers, who were conducting the test. From their computers, they would have to control, troubleshoot and monitor the test as it progressed. Students also needed to understand how they would be accessing the test, which involved inputting individual identification codes into the platform and conducting audio tests. Practice test windows were highly valuable in preparing staff and students.

​As NAPLAN coordinator on the Primary Campus, Kate Frewin was able to provide insight into the preparation of staff and students:
There was a small amount of training involved. Coordinators were trained by ISQ and QCAA staff. We then trained the teachers administering the test at a school level. This was followed by a student preparation stage which was relatively simple and fast. This involved  familiarising our students with the NAPLAN Portal. We were extremely impressed by how adaptive our students were. 

Teacher Observations and Reflections

Testing online was conducted over two weeks. This was due to the number of school devices we had available to use at one time. Several teachers agreed that having the tests stretched out over a two-week period was quite  disruptive and that they would rather have the testing completed quickly over the traditional three days. To do this in the future, we would have to make use of student owned devices, which would present more challenges in preparation and ensuring a consistent experience. Despite this feedback, general observations and reflections were positive.
I was unexpectedly happy with the whole process. I thought it was going to be far more painful than it was. When we had a technical problem it was easily solved and there were no major hiccups. I liked that it was paperless and that once the kids finished the tests, that was the end of it for the teachers.
​- Samantha Hutton, Year 5 Teacher
Picture
I was impressed with the quality of work our students achieved during the delivery of the test online. Our dedicated teachers worked extremely hard at ensuring our students were familiar with the platform and that they understood their responsibility to pace themselves the same as they would during the paper version and not get ‘click-crazy’.
- Kate Frewin, Teaching and Learning Coordinator

It ran very smoothly.  Preparation is definitely the key.  I think that using College devices meant that we had much fewer connectivity issues but it did mean that we had sessions running for the whole 9 days as we couldn’t run many concurrent sessions. 
​- Wendy Jurss, Director of Teaching and Learning

Thoughts on Typing Vs Hand-written

There continues to be much debate around students completing the writing task online. Perceptions in year 7 and 9 are more positive than in earlier years of schooling. Wendy Jurss, Director of Teaching and Learning, commented that student output appeared greater on the writing test than it had in previous years. With students in the high school now having taken part in a 1:1 BYOD program for the last 3 years, it could be suggested that a developing competency with technology contributed to this.

Year 3 teacher Robyn Behr is of the opinion that the writing test should remain hand-written in year 3:
  • I think by year three, their writing is a skill that has moved into ‘auto pilot’ mode. This means that the only thing they need to be concentrating on is developing their ideas and remembering how to format their work. If they were to type their ideas I don’t think their true potential would be seen as their main focus would be on their typing skills and not on their content.
Typing does present an added cognitive load to the process. The move toward online writing assessment appears to be allowing the results of prioritised literacy skills to somewhat rely on underprioritised technology competency. Despite there being General Capabilities relating to ICT skill and Australian Curriculum subjects focused on computer science, technology is still regarding as an "extra" in classrooms. Many schools engage with little more than a superficial implementation of technology in the early years of schooling.

If this is to be the future of NAPLAN an
d other external assessments, schools are going to have to very seriously consider their technology integration in the primary years, which is severely lacking in many right now. Insufficient exposure to technology tools could potentially hamper student ability to perform to their full potential in online testing. This is not a case against teaching handwriting or a call to replace books and pencils in schools with devices. Fundamentals are important and always will be. Similarly, this is also not the only reason for improved technology integration in schools and is in fact a very small part of the argument*. Nevertheless it remains a consideration that I encourage schools to consider as we move towards the full implementation of NAPLAN online. 

*Further discussion on the typing vs hand-written debate can be found in a previous blog post here.

The Age of Digital Texts

A similar argument could be made in relation to the reading tests. Previous experience interacting with digital texts could be beneficial to students completing the reading test online. Year 3 teacher Robyn Behr highlighted a potential issue relating to the random assignment of reading material during the test:
There were six pieces of reading (each one at a different level) and students received them in random order. Some got the hardest piece first. For those confident readers the order was not an issue but for those students whose reading is average or below average it would have been very off-putting and potentially detrimental to their results.
Observations during the reading test did reveal some limitations of the interface. The texts were long and quite small on screen. Many digital reading platforms allow students to flick through texts as you might do in a physical book. A lot of students are accustomed to this. Students were zooming in on texts which raises questions as to how well they are actually reading the text or if they are even reading the entire text. There were several instances where students had zoomed in to texts and then lost the frame with the questions. Improvements to the size and presentation of digital texts on the platform would improve user experience.

Conclusions and Recommendations

Our experience with NAPLAN Online was a positive one. I believe this is greatly due to the hard work of our staff in preparation for the test and ensuring that the technology could support the event from an IT perspective. Student exposure to technology through our BYOD program appears to greatly reduce technology related anxiety and complications. There remains the question of exploring the use of student-owned devices in order to complete tests in a shorter time-frame. A more targeted and mindful approach to developing typing may enable students even more. Further development into the interface will help ensure students have the opportunity to achieve their best. Despite our feelings and experiences conducting the test itself, the outcomes are what we will be paying the most attention to. It will be very interesting to compare student data once it is released. 

Contributors

Special thanks and credit to the staff of The Springfield Anglican College who contributed their feedback to help inform this article:
Picture
Kate Frewin
​Teaching and Learning Coordinator P- 6
Picture
Megan Ellis
​Year 5 Teacher
Picture
Samantha Hutton
​Year 5 Teacher
Picture
Robyn Behr
​Year 3 Teacher
Picture
Lisa Christofis
​Year 3 Teacher
Picture
Emmanuel Edem
​IT Manager
Picture
Wendy Jurss
Director of Teaching and Learning
Year 7 Teachers:
Shandelle Crosby
Jonathan Cox
Ann Haines-Shipman
0 Comments

WWDC 2018 Sharing New Possibilities for AR in Education

9/6/2018

0 Comments

 
Earlier this week at their World Wide Developer Conference (WWDC), Apple showcased developments with their ARKit. Two exciting developments were the Measure App and their collaboration with Lego. Both of these present possible applications in educational settings and suggest where AR in education is heading. 
Picture

Measure

Picture
Augmented Reality measuring apps are not exactly a new thing in the Apple App Store but Apple delivering this tool as standard in IOS 12, will see the end of these third-party offerings. Having tried a few of these out myself and being disappointed, I am excited to give Apple's version a try. Given their track record, I am expecting it to be a fairly accurate and adaptable tool. 

In his demonstration, Apple Senior Vice President Craig Federighi measured a 3D object (the suitcase pictured) and 2D shapes (a photograph on a table). ​While the demonstration with the suitcase showed an example of how length was captured, there was no demonstration of a volume calculation after measuring length, width and height. I am curious to know if this is a capability. The app automatically identified the dimensions of the flat image and did produce data on the length and area of the image instantly.
Picture
Picture
While many may think of this as a nifty extra on their iPhone or iPad, it represents a huge possibility in how AR can be developed to support mathematics and other subjects in education. Imagine setting children the task of calculating length, perimeter or volume of real-life objects. Add in the ability to ink onto a screen capture or record mathematical process over the top and you have a great way for students to demonstrate their understanding. This is pretty much achievable now, with a few steps in between, but what would be really good to see is a few developers jumping on this capability and honing it to educational needs. 

To see the demonstration of Measure, check out the video below. ​
Picture

AR and Lego

I love Lego and was thrilled to see this partnership showcased in in the WWDC keynote. The Director of Innovation from Lego shared how they have used ARKit 2 to develop a new app allowing 3D object detection with Lego Creator Sets. Children can see their Lego world expand right before their eyes and interact with it in exciting ways. Built in challenges and the ability to add extra elements to the scene take play a little deeper.

You can see the Lego AR demonstration in the video below.
What really stood out for me was the collaboration that was enabled through Shared Experiences, a new feature of AR Kit 2. Up to 4 players could share in the experience of the Lego world. Another example produced by Apple was an interactive game between 2 players which also allowed others to observe. This got me thinking about the potential of collaborative student projects and demonstrations in AR. Again, there is a need for developers to mindfully harness this capability for educational purposes. 

AR in Education

Examples such as these set my mind buzzing. We now need to see this technology move beyond the simple substitution of what we can do in real-life and offer added functionality or allow students to work in more transformational ways with it. Shared Experiences is promising for collaborative tasks and AR Measurement tools could be harnessed to enable deeper understanding or application of mathematical concepts. I am looking forward to some innovative developers bringing these tools to education. 
​
To see the full Keynote from WWDC, click here.

Do you have any thoughts or ideas about AR in Education? Leave a comment below!
0 Comments

Hand Written Vs Typed

13/5/2018

0 Comments

 
Over the past two weeks, the students at my school have been among the first in the state to take NAPLAN (National Assessment Program of Literacy and Numeracy) online. Traditionally these are a paper-based assessment. Students completed the writing test on computers, as well as numeracy, reading and language conventions (spelling and grammar). I was so happy (and relieved) at how well things went. This event highlighted ongoing debate among teachers in relation to the impact technology is having on the development of student writing skills. It is a topic I have been throwing around in my mind for some time now and in this blog, I share some of my thoughts....
Picture

My experiences as a writer

I wasn't the best student in Primary School. I remember with clarity the ordeal that writing was for me. It wasn't easy. I was a weak speller and I struggled to compose writing that flowed. My mother would have to stand over me to get me to finish my weekly homework project. I remember rubbing out pages until they'd tear and starting pieces of writing over and over again until my hand ached. My handwriting, in contrast, was beautiful. A more gorgeous page of student writing would be rare to find and yet the minute you actually read it...well, it was pretty average. Many primary school teachers of course know that you don't judge a piece of writing by how it looks on the page, but I am fairly certain it helped me fly under the radar as a child. 

This continued into junior high school until my family got a computer...and I distinctly remember things changing at this point. Composing text became easier. Editing and improving my writing was quick and didn't require me to start over. Spelling didn't hold me back and I learned new ways to say things with the built-in thesaurus. I could set out a few ideas and pad them out. Something about it just worked for me. Fairly quickly, my writing improved. I even started to enjoy writing! By the end of high school, I was an A student in English...who went on to be a teacher....and now a blogger! (That is not me saying that I am a good writer, just that I enjoy it more)

​It is for these reasons (based on my own experiences) that I do not see technology as the evil that many others do. I do not feel that using a thesaurus or spell checker is cheating. My spelling and vocabulary improved with the help of these tools. I actually believe that the online Writing NAPLAN test should allow students to use all of the tools that a real writer might have access to in a platform such as Microsoft Word. If you want to test grammar, spelling or punctuation - do this in the language conventions test and let the writing be about ideas, structure and fluency. 

Digital Text 

Looking back on my journey, I believe that it was technology that enabled me as a writer and as a learner. In the first few seconds of this video, the nature of digital text is illustrated. It is more flexible, movable and essentially more dynamic. The ability to expand or edit ideas and move them around the page is what makes digital tools powerful when composing a piece of writing.  
I acknowledge that this may not be the same for everyone. I just know it worked for me. In saying this, I challenge those who are inflexibly single minded on hand written composition to consider that it may not work for everyone also. With so much talk about enabling learners, individualisation and differentiation why are we not allowing students to benefit from technology tools? 

Writing goes digital

I have always been fan of jotting down a few notes or brainstorming on a big sheet of paper. The digital ink revolution has well and truly arrived. I was excited a few years ago when Bluetooth styluses became available but was sadly disappointed with  the experience. Apple Pencil with an iPad and Surface Pen with a Surface allow really pleasing digital inking experiences. I now find myself inking on my various devices more and more. What is even better about this experience is now we are seeing hand written text becoming more dynamic - searchable or expanding to enabling such things as ink to text or ink to math. 
Picture
Picture

Looking towards the future, not towards a test

Picture
When you look towards the future, chances are that the ways we communicate will continue to evolve. Californian based company, Tap, have recently released a wearable keyboard. Dictation tools are better than they have ever been and will likely continue to improve. The AR and VR space is gaining momentum and could potentially emerge with the 3D text manipulation the likes of which you might have only seen in sci-fi movies.
​It is worth considering what we should be preparing our students for. Years ago, the ability to write pages and pages was required for students to survive standardised testing. With tests such as NAPLAN now moving online, it begs the question if this kind of gruelling endurance is required anymore. When I think about my day-to-day life, even working as a teacher I do not write out a lot of things by hand very often apart from the odd sticky note. There are very few paper forms I have to complete these days. I am currently working on an essay for university and there is no way that I am hand writing that! This is just not how things are done anymore. 

It's not about one over another - it's more about the what over the how

I am getting over so many binary arguments in education - it's not always one or the other. With so much technology bashing lately, I felt like I had to make the argument for typing but the reality is that both methods still have merit and application. The most important thing is what is being written, not how it is being written. Different tools suit different purposes. Sometimes it is good to scribble some ideas out and to this day, I still love a hand-written letter. But sometimes when you are trying to piece together a more complex piece of writing, you just need the flexibility of digital text.

I'd love to hear your perspectives on this topic. Please leave a comment below!
0 Comments

Teachers on Social Media

7/5/2018

0 Comments

 
With so many schools now taking the leap and establishing a presence on social media, teachers may feel the gap closing between their personal and professional lives. In this post, I discuss my approach to social media as an educator and why I prefer to maintain separate personal and professional social media accounts.
Picture

A scenario...

​A school Facebook page post some positive news to their Facebook page (such as a recent sporting victory). A teacher from the school, who is following the page, then likes the post as does parents and students of the school. Parents or students of the school may then notice the like and follow through to the teacher account, which then (depending on many varying settings) may allow them to see photos, videos, page likes, posts from friends or apps....the list goes on. In addition to this, teachers can then be put in the awkward situation of receiving friend requests or private messages (which can be sent without actually being a friend on Facebook). I have experienced this situation myself.

In most cases people do not understand how deep you have to dive into Facebook's settings to ensure your personal information stays personal. It can be very difficult to control third party apps and other people tagging you in posts. If you are like me and have been on Facebook for over 10 years, some history literally has to have settings change individually. Similar scenarios can also occur on Twitter or Instagram accounts (that are not set to private).  

Personal Vs Professional 

So many teachers just avoid social media and that's a shame. I am constantly acknowledging the benefits of engaging in the PLNs (Professional Learning Networks) I have become a part of on social media platforms such as Twitter. They have opened doors and provided great opportunities to engage with some amazing and inspirational people. I also love social media for the same reasons everyone else does - sharing and connecting with my friends and family and to explore my hobbies and interest areas. Teachers can have the best of both worlds on social media. I do this by maintaining both a personal and professional identity on social media platforms. This may sound like lots of work, but it really isn't. Jumping between accounts is remarkably easy across many platforms. 
​

Tips for juggling identities....

Personal 
Professional
  • Ensure personal accounts are private and keep the visible information to a minimum. You don't have to include location, birthday, education or relationship status. You can even opt for a screen name and use an avatar over a real photograph of yourself. Doing these things can make you more difficult to find.​
  • ​Dive deep into the settings and make sure everything you want private is actually private. Viewing your profile from the outside is a good way to check what it looks like to non-friends or followers.
  • ​Keep watch on updates to privacy settings and how new features change what information is shared. 
  • Having a private account doesn't give you free reign. Remember that nothing dies online and screen shots can happen.
  • ​Avoid connecting or associating these accounts with work email addresses.
  • ​It is okay to have work colleges as friends. Some of my best friends are the people I work with. 
  • ​While you can control your settings, you cannot control your friends settings. Be mindful of pictures and posts that you may be tagged in. 
  • Don't friend or follow current parents or students....just don't. Always communicate with students and parents through the channels approved by your school. 
  • Maintain a professional image on teacher accounts. Don't say anything you wouldn't say in front of a colleague or parent.
  • Friend or connect with other professionals and build a professional learning network. Share experiences and engage in professional dialogue.
  • Keep likes and follows relevant to your industry
  • Avoid connecting with family or friends on these accounts. Explain that the account is for professional networking only. 
  • If these accounts are public, don't make yourself too easy to find. This is still the internet after all...
This isn't a perfect recipe. This is what I have found works for me and it may not be the solution that works for you. I feel that Social Media has so much to offer people personally and professionally. If you agree, this approach might be worth a try....

​As a teacher, how do you currently manage your presence on social media? I'd love to know. Leave a comment below!
0 Comments

Women and the heroic ideals of leadership

3/3/2018

0 Comments

 
A heroic ideal of leadership,  which excludes women and is deeply rooted in Australian cultural mythology. Historical accounts and popular folklore have elevated our belief in the redemptive powers of solitary, courageous men who triumph through endurance, stamina and self-reliance.
Amanda Sinclair, 1998​

If our notions of leadership are socially constructed and based in Australian white-settler mentality, what does this mean for women aspiring to leadership? AND should women even be aspiring to be that kind of leader?

Leadership is associated with the lone and powerful, self-reliant male. Notions of collaboration and collective leadership are viewed as weakness. Women in leadership roles that I have experienced have succeeded by perpetuating this image. Does that mean that unless women adopt this approach, they can never really succeed in leadership?

Statues from ancient societies remind us of the awesome powers of goddesses and high priestess. Mythology around the Amazons and Valkyries also painted women as fearless and powerful individuals. Yet, over time these models faded as patriarchal forms of authority became the norm. These were the result of a range of factors, including the different modes of economic production and the impact that then had on family structures.

As we move towards a more global, networked society where information technology is becoming a predominant tool, allowing a highly collaborative and flexible workforce that is valuing innovation and creativity, will our current notion of leadership begin to change?
0 Comments

Leadership in Schools as a Social Construct

3/3/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
The structure of leadership in schools is similar to that of a monarchy. The king's power was absolute as is the principal's or head teacher's power in many schools. This is because the very foundation that educational institutions are based is a socially constructed and so widely accepted model that reflects the hierarchical monarchies of the past.
​
By definition social construction refers to commonly accepted models and understandings that are results of social or cultural practice. They are jointly constructed, widely accepted and so difficult to change. Having now considered the structure of our schools, I actually find it perplexing. Education serves a civic purpose, so why is that in our schools, which are supposed to be preparing students for a democratic society, we model anything but? If anything, we model a very watered down version of democracy which may be considered consultative or delegatory. This autocratic power model perpetuates right down to the classroom level, where teachers reign over their students.

Despite the lack of transformation of leadership structures into the 21st Century, the role of the Principal or Head Teacher has grown and more closely resembles the role of a CEO. They are responsible for marketing and image management, external performance evaluations and the running of the school as "business" on top of being the leading professional practitioner. It is also easy to understand hesitancy to relinquish power when accountability is higher than ever.

This discussion raises far more questions than it answers. While different educational models exist, they do not represent the norm and still adhere to an autocratic leadership model beyond the classroom. Who is to say that a transformation of leadership structures would transform education itself? My inner classroom teacher senses the potential for chaos while my inner educational activist says "giddy-up!"​
0 Comments

Reflections on Educational Leadership

3/3/2018

0 Comments

 
This year I am starting my Masters in Education. Despite specialising in Information Technologies, I have also decided to commit time to studying Education Leadership. It was my talents with technology that threw me into my current leadership role. Over the last few years, I have had to work hard to grow into the leadership side of my position. While I exhibit some characteristics, I am not the classic type A personality that so many leaders are and I recognise that it is a skill I want to develop further.

As I commence my first subjects this week, I found myself reflecting on my understandings of leadership in education. To be a successful leader, you need a deeply thought-through philosophy about leadership. You also need to constantly interrogate and re-evaluate your leadership practices and beliefs. 
Picture

What is Leadership in Education?

I believe that leadership is a process and not a necessarily a position. While leadership positions exist in educational institutions, individuals can be leaders without any formal authority. Leaders are people who initiate change and growth. They are people that can see possibilities and develop a vision. It is for this reason, I feel that creativity can be a valuable skill in leadership. Leaders build culture, inspiring engagement and collaboration, and they maximise the potential of the talented individuals around them.

​I do think there is some difference between being a leader and being a manager, although admit that many educational leadership roles require skills in both. ​Leadership is about producing change and growth by envisioning and designing strategies to move forward. Management is more about enacting these strategies, ensuring order and consistency. Management is more tactical and hands on while leadership is strategic and visionary.

What is the purpose of Educational Leadership?

Educational organisations have obligations to society, the needs of their learners and the requirements of other key stakeholders. Leadership in Education is somewhat responsive to these needs and obligations and responsible for driving them. People in these positions need to develop strategies and point their schools in the right direction after analysing industry trends in relation to their context. 

Where do we gain leadership knowledge and skills?

Leadership skills are something that can be improved over time through study, mentorship and experience. Leaders are individuals who develop interpersonal and communication skills, build relationships and become more self aware. Learning more about the "business of education", change management, educational policies and compliance are key in becoming an educational leader. Many also model their leadership styles after those they have experienced themselves. Mentoring can be highly valuable to beginning leaders. Transparency within the organisation also permits a view inside and an opportunity to learn.
0 Comments

Getting the most from the Communication Tools in Class Dojo

1/3/2018

0 Comments

 
Clear and consistent communication is something that schools can struggle with and finding the right tool can be tricky. Alongside its dynamite classroom management tools, Class Dojo actually has some very useful communication features that are often overlooked. In my opinion, they are the best part of Class Dojo. Parents love to see what their children are doing at school and feel a part of their learning journey.
Picture
The tricky part can sometimes be, knowing what to use for different purposes. Here is my quick guide to using the different communication tools on Class Dojo.

Class Story

Picture
This feed is designed to showcase what is going on in your class. Share examples of learning, celebrate achievements, advertise upcoming events. Photos or videos of groups of students with a caption explaining the task is ideal. Other great uses can be to share homework or assignment tasks by adding attachments to posts. I had a teacher last year, use it for his "Daily Recap" which was a hit with parents. 
DO: Keep this feed very visual - parents will keep coming back for more! Try to avoid posting just text messages – that is more what the “all parents” broadcast feature is for in Messages.

DON’T: Post a stream of individual photos of children. Parents will get annoyed at 20+ notifications and having to scroll through a river of posts. They only really want to see their own child. Groups of children and collages of photographs are better. Individual shots can go on individual Student Stories.

Student Story 

Student story items just appear within the general feed of that child’s parent and so are mixed in with their Class Story and School Story. This is great way to individualise posts and share a child’s learning journey with their parents. The student can also see these posts from their student account. The best thing about Student  Story is that the kids can do it themselves! One less thing for you to take care of in your busy classroom.
​
Picture
DO: Teach students to post themselves! Don’t worry, you approve all posts before they go live. Use it to document evidence of learning for reporting descriptors, to collect formative assessment and as a student reflection tool. 
​
DON’T: Use this as a way to send messages to parents. The students can see this themselves.


Messages

This is a quick and easy, but an often overlooked tool. Messages can put you in instant contact with parents. You can tell if they have viewed a message (by the blue tick) and the date they viewed it. You can send the same message to all parents all at once using the broadcast feature, which is great for quick text reminders. You can also schedule messages to be sent at a certain date and time which is useful for those who like to plan ahead.
​
DO: Use it for quick text reminders instead of posting them to the Class Story.
​
DON’T: Use informal language. Although it feels a bit like a chat interface, keep correspondence professional at all time.






Thanks for reading. I hope you found this Blog helpful.
Picture
0 Comments

To BYOD or not to BYOD....

28/2/2018

1 Comment

 
It is fairly difficult to ignore the importance of technology in education these days. As well as enhancing the learning experience, the development of technology related skills and knowledge is now essential for learners. In Australia, the importance placed on developing these skills resulted in the Digital Technologies subject being added to our national curriculum. 

​But how do schools deliver technology enriched learning to students? Trolleys of shared devices can only get the quality of the experience so far and are a nightmare to manage. A fully immersive experience ideally requires students to work with their own device. 1:1 student to device ratios are the dream but hard to achieve for many schools.

​Enter the BYOD solution....Bring Your Own Device! Seems ideal....right? And it does have the potential to be - but there is a reason I jokingly refer to it as Bring Your Own Disaster.....
Picture
Change doesn't happen overnight.....and change with technology takes more time than most things. While I look back at how far the school has come, it has taken a number of years to get there.

A bit of history...

​2018 is my fourth year in a technology leadership role at my school. In that time I have overseen the expansion of the BYOD program from Year 6 down to Year 3. ​Up until this year, iPads were the required device in our BYOD classrooms. In 2018, as the program expanded down into Year 3, the decision was made to switch to a full Windows device with the aim of eventually phasing out our student iPads. There were several reasons behind the switch and this is certainly not a blog comparing the pros and cons of different devices. Despite the migration to Windows devices for student use, iPads will continue to have a presence on the Primary Campus and in our Maker Space. 

Weighing it up

So, having just this year launched BYOD in Year 3 and after my experiences with it over the last few years, what are my thoughts?
THE PROS

  • It is offers a genuine solution for schools that cannot afford to provide students with sufficient devices to have any real impact
  • Students learn to look after and manage their own technology - let's face it, this is a life skill these days.
  • Students are working on a familiar device which can also be customised to their needs, including the needs of learners with disabilities.
  • It allows IT budgets to be spent on developing better infrastructure in schools to support classrooms of devices and other technology equipment.
  • The quality of the learner experience on 1:1 devices cannot be beaten.
  • It provides greater opportunities for collaboration with peers and faster feedback from teachers.
  • It enables anywhere, anytime learning - including the potential for flipped learning. 
THE CONS

  • Without explicit specifications, you can end up with a really mixed bag of devices, using different operating systems and with different capabilities. 
  • Classroom teachers are faced with the added stresses of charging, storage and troubleshooting student problems. It often represents a big learning curve for educators in terms of application and pedagogy.
  • The sudden influx of students devices has a real impact on school Wi-Fi and internet capabilities. Planning ahead to improve this capability is essential. 
  • More devices often means the need for more support personnel.
  • Accidents happen and things get broken. Policy documents and need to be created and shared to ensure clarity in these situations.
  • Technology provides another potential avenue for misconduct, bullying and online safety risks. User agreements, expectations and suitable eSafety curriculum have to be included in the vision. 
  • ​A lack of parent knowledge and skill with technology can mean that you will end up having to assist a lot more than you think.

My advice

The BYOD solution to school 1:1 technology implementation is a totally viable option, but it comes with a cost to all involved. Families have to shoulder the cost. This can be a very big ask, especially for families with more than 1 student at a school. Schools need to amp up their training and tech support to keep it afloat. It takes a lot of time and manpower (or in my case, womanpower) to get everything running smoothly. Teachers also have the added pressures of troubleshooting technology and integrating it effectively into their practice. 

​Can it be done? Yes, it can. I don't think I have it perfect by a long shot, but compared to a couple years ago, I am actually pretty proud of our progress. For those thinking of taking steps towards BYOD:
  • Plan ahead. I cannot stress this enough. Get stakeholders involved. Consult with the parent community. Give LOTS of notice. Develop user agreements and policy documents. Really think about the specifications you want. 
  • Work on infrastructure now. It's no good getting devices into schools and not having the network capable of supporting them.
  • Build your champion network of teachers. Provide opportunities for professional development and support them as much as you can. They will determine if the program sinks or swims at the end of the day.
  • ​Understand that this is going to take some time to work...be patient and persistent.
  • Share the success and promote what BYOD and 1:1 programs can help students to achieve. Build a positive culture around technology.
1 Comment

Skype-a-thon 2017

9/12/2017

0 Comments

 
The 2017 Skype-a-thon event was my first dip into the world of Skype in the classroom and what fun it was! I worked with Year 6 students, who spoke with the services lead of Microsoft Australia and a Year 4 Class, who participated in our first Mystery Skype. Nothing like diving right into the deep end!
Picture

Set Up

In preparation for the event, I did get a Logitech C922 Pro Stream Webcam just to give myself a little more flexibility with setup. I already had an Aidio Technica USB Microphone, but found the Mic in the Webcam to be more than sufficent when the children were right in front of it as they were for both Skype calls. Although the webcam came with a mini tripod, I mounted it on a full-sized tripod, which was perfect. 

​You can see examples of setup below:
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Mytery Skype

Of both calls, the Mystery Skype call was my favourite. For anyone new to the world of Mystery Skype, I liken it to playing a game of twenty questions mixed with the old computer game 'Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?' (from the 90s).  Classes connect over Skype not knowing where either are in the world. They then take turns asking yes or no style questions with the aim finding out their exact school location. Its a fun and frantic race to be the first who guess correctly. 

The natural difficulty being in Australia is that our time zone leaves our choice of competitors a little limited. The class we versed were in Melbourne, so not really a world away from our Brisbane location, but a good start for our first game of Mystery Skype. Despite our efforts we were beaten by our competitors, but the children were not sad at all. The enegry in the room was electric. They had so much fun and couldn’t wait to play again. 
Picture

Organising and running a Mystery Skype

Picture
I was fortunate to connect with another MIE Expert via Twitter amidst all the Skype-a-thon buzz online to set up my Mystery Skype. Fortunately for me, Adrian Hanson was an absolute master of Mystery Skype and shared some great tips. The day before the Mystery Skype we had a practice where I pretended to be from another school in the world. I think this went a long way in preparing the children for the main event and would recommend doing this when getting started. An alternative might be to have classes on site verse each other to practice.

It was Jonathon Roberts, anther fabulous Skype Expert, who told me all about assigning roles to students within the classroom during a Mystery Skype. We used the Collaboration Space in our OneNote Class Notebook to communicate during the Mystery Skype. 
​
I broke the students into the following roles:
  • Presenters - the three students on camera the whole time, who read and give the offical responses to questions
  • Question Writers - with the job of creating questions following the responses of the opponent 
  • Researchers - working closely with question writers and presenters, these students use Google Maps and other tools to inform questioning and ensure the accuracy of presenter responses. 
  • Recorders - tick off the questions we have asked, record responses and record the questions we have asked in the Collaboration Space
 
Picture
In a larger class, there are certainly more roles that could be assigned, but this seemed to work once we go rolling. Also, extremely useful where printed signs to back up communication within the classroom and over the Skype call. Just a simple Yes, No and Please Wait, were very useful as we researched and responded to questions.

Learning to Ask Questions

A great tip I also learnt from Jonathon was to get the children thinking of questions that halved the search area. This really gets them using directional language, scale and landmarks. Students should always start large and work their way down to localised, more specific questions based on the responses on their opponent. For example:
  • Start gloabaly - Are you in the Southern Hemisphere?
  • Work into regions - Are you in the Asia/ Pacific region?
  • Locate the nation - Is your country South of Indonesia? Are you in Australia?
  • Work in halves - Are you on the east coast of Australia?
  • Look for capital cities - Are you in a 20km radius of Brisbane?
  • Use landmarks - Are you south of the Brisbane River?
.....and so on

Depending on how the local population is distributed, students acting as researchers may need to be finding out about states, suburbs, boroughs or councils. It's such a fun and authentic way for students to engage with Geography. 

Find Out More

To learn more about Mystery Skype and get started, visit the Microsoft Educator Community. As well as online courses to introduce you to who it all works, you can set your availability ​times and connect with other educators or experts from around the world to Skype with. You are not limited to setting up Mystery Skype calls, but can also arrange virtual field trips and Skype calls with subject experts. 

Keep your eyes peeled for the next Skype-a-thon event in 2018. It is sure to be a lot of fun!
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    Laura's Blog

    Read all about my thoughts on teaching in the 21st Century, my experiences with technology in the classroom, running a Maker Space, launching STEAM and Design Thinking with students, coding, robotics and much more!
    Keep up to date by subscribing below!


    Email Updates

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    RSS Subscription

    Click the button below:
    Subscribe

    RSS Feed


    Archives

    January 2019
    December 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    August 2016
    June 2016
    June 2015
    November 2014


    Categories

    All
    Apple
    Applications
    Apps
    AR
    Assessment
    Badges
    Binary
    Class Dojo
    Code Club
    Coding
    Computer Science
    Devices
    Digital Ink
    Digital Technologies Curriculum
    ESafety
    Events
    Forms
    Holidays
    ICT Capabilities
    Ideas
    Leadership
    Learning Environments
    Lego
    LittleBits
    Microsoft
    Mindfulness
    NAPLAN
    National Science Week
    OneNote
    Ozobots
    Reporting
    Robots
    Science
    Social Media
    Sphero
    STEAM
    STEM
    Teacher Tools
    Tips

Home
About
Contact
Technology will never replace great teachers, but technology in the hands of great teachers is transformational  -  George Couros